Tag Archives: Cedar Rapids

Column — Library Uncertainty

Cedar Rapids Library boosters certainly make a strong case for a new central library.

But I wonder whether the $45 million project may catch a fatal case of uncertainty.

The library board of trustees wants to replace the flooded 85,000-squarefoot central library in the heart of downtown with a 105,000-squarefoot library on higher ground on the northeast edge of downtown. They want more space, more computers, a larger collection, more amenities and no threat of water.

They hope to use Federal Emergency Management Agency, state and private funding to cover the bill.

Of all the public facilities pipe dreams floating around, I find the library most compelling. It could benefit thousands of local residents, including folks who are hanging on in nearby flood-affected neighborhoods.

But library backers also say they need more operating bucks. So they want voters to approve raising the current 4-cent library property tax levy to a maximum of 27 cents for 10 years. They’re determined to put it on the ballot in November’s city election.

Essentially, the levy vote will be a referendum on plans for a new, larger library.

But what will voters know going into the booth?

Unfortunately, they may not know where, exactly, a new library would be located. It all depends on whether the library board and City Council, which has the final say, can figure it out soon.

They won’t see an architect’s plan for a new library. That comes later.

They may not know, for certain, how much FEMA will chip in. Some of the funding will still be more hope than promise.

That worries me. I’d like to see this project make it. This, potentially, could say something important about the future of Cedar Rapids.

But when ballot measures die, uncertainty is usually the cause of death. Where facts are fuzzy, more often than not, criticism, and sometimes misinformation, fills the gap. And the ill-tempered electorate heading to the polls this November will be in no mood to take “trust us” as an acceptable answer.

So why not hold off until all those questions are answered? State law requires that a library levy be voted on in a city general election, held every two years. After this year’s, the next is 2011.

But the Legislature could change that law, just as it gave us a break on the sales tax. That would pave the way for a special election next year. It’s no sure thing, but a November vote could be riskier.

Backers are certain they can’t wait. Uncertain voters, however, may insist.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Put out the Red Light

The Daily-Herald, which covers Chicago’s northwest suburbs, carries news today that Schaumburg, Ill., is dropping its red light traffic enforcement cameras after eight “tumultuous” months.

That news comes along with a Daily-Herald investigative series over the weekend that raised some red flags about red light cameras:

Most of the $100 red-light tickets are issued for turning right without coming to a complete stop. Traffic experts question the value of making this such a high priority, since it results in few serious accidents.

The answer is, “ka-ching.” In some of the communities surveyed by the paper, 90 percent of red light camera violations involved right turns on red. In some cases drivers who were ticketed did stop, just not at the white line.

Clearly, red light cameras can be used with the goal of making intersections safer. But this also shows the technology can become a revenue cash cow with little regard for improved safety.

Red light cameras are expected to be installed in Cedar Rapids this fall. Police and city officials here have insisted the cameras are all about improving traffic safety, not raising revenue.

8 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Thursday Column — In with a tweet, and lots of questions

So Christian Fong couldn’t wait.

The Republican Cedar Rapids marketing executive kicked off his run for governor with a Twitter tweet. Contrast that with the last GOP nominee, Jim Nussle, who entered the 2006 race with glitzy fanfare usually reserved for presidential hopefuls. We’ve gone from bunting and balloon drops to 140 characters on my BlackBerry.

Nussle burst in with the stature of a congressional power-broker known far and wide. Fong, 32, looks as if he’s still growing into his suit. He’s well-known and well-regarded locally. Elsewhere, he’s a question mark.

And questions swirl. Will Republicans send someone born in the days of disco to the big dance, to go toe-to-toe with the Big Lug? Can Fong’s bid to make history, as the youngest governor and the son of a Chinese immigrant, overcome his troubling lack of an electoral history? Can he convince the agitated right that “progressive conservative” isn’t shorthand for a squishy moderate who contributed bucks to Democrats?

Can a guy whose name rhymes with “wrong” weather the shots he’ll get from seasoned pols eager to take him out?

And will Iowans make a blogger governor?

Many candidates blog. Most offer small treats. Fong blogs in treatises.

Still, for a fresh face, there’s plenty of boilerplate. There are calls for investments and zones and a task force on tax policy. Big government is “too often the problem.” Teachers should be paid more if they meet higher standards. Rural schools are great. Marriage is between one man and one woman.

It’s not all bad. Just not all new. But there are glimpses into how Fong might shake things up.

He warns against practicing single-issue, ideological politics and urges the rejection of a “bizarre stream of conservatism that values ideological loyalty above all.” Fong decries labeling opponents as “extremist” in what he calls a “playground insult war.”

He might want to share that with one of his top backers, Iowans for Tax Relief chief Ed Failor Jr., who recently told a GOP crowd the Democrats’ agenda is Nazi-like.

Fong toes the party line on marriage, but he also wrote this before the Legislature adjourned: “The GOP needs to stop playing political games. Their frantic calls for a marriage amendment, ‘or it’s too late,’ are counterfactual to the realities of how the constitutional process works … let me suggest that turning a moral issue into a political chip is both disrespectful to the people involved and trivializes an important debate.”

But will he say that at a Sioux County soup supper? We’ll have to wait and see.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Hinzman Suspends his Mayoral Ambitions

Gary Hinzman says he’s staying on the sidelines in Cedar Rapids’ mayoral race, at least for the time being.

For months, the director of the Sixth District Department of Correctional Services was expected to run. He posted a campaign Web site and asked city officials for advice on any ethics problems that his election might pose for family members who work for the city.

But Hinzman now says he’s suspending those efforts.

“I’m not interested in getting into a political campaign,” Hinzman said. “The city needs good leadership. Hopefully, there will be candidates who can provide good leadership.”

Hinzman said he might change his mind and jump in later if declared candidates fail to address important issues. The only candidate officially in the race is former Iowa House speaker and CR chamber president Ron Corbett, who Hinzman said is “picking up steam and rolling right along.”

His ambitions, he said, have complicated his day job. That includes raising funds and spearheading community projets for the Corrections Association Foundation.

“It’s hard to do something positive without people thinking there’s a political motive behind it,” Hinzman said.

Hinzman’s s decision comes a week after City Council member Monica Vernon announced that she will not run for mayor.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Tuesday Column – Bureaucracy v. Boathouses

Bureaucracy appears intent on sinking the boathouses.

A year after the flood, which brought destruction and state scrutiny to Ellis Boat Harbor, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources is charting a course for boathouse extinction. True, it’s letting existing boathouses stay, so long as owners comply with costly regulations and don’t sell or transfer ownership to anyone outside the harbor.

Over time, thanks to those rules and nontransferability, the harbor community will empty out. And that’s what the DNR wants.

“Our sovereign water belongs to all the people of Iowa,” said Jennifer Lancaster, director of law enforcement for the DNR in northeast Iowa. The agency says the structures are illegal. “Why should these folks have more access to the water than everybody else?”

I don’t blame Lancaster for doing her job, and owners should be required to comply with reasonable regulations.

But why take this harbor away from some people of Iowa who have enjoyed it for decades for the sake of other people who might use it? No one is clamoring for the boathouses to be removed. Lancaster said complaints are few.

And after a flood that decimated and disrupted so many historic communities and unique traditions in this city, why does the state want to have a hand in finishing off one more? Is that really what the people of Iowa want?

“Very bluntly, I believe the DNR is making it as difficult as they can,” said City Council member Chuck Wieneke, who represents the harbor. “I believe the boathouses make the harbor. I’d like to see them stay.” I also think the harbor is worth preserving.

After I wrote about the boathouses in July, I got a call from Mary Lundby, the late, former state senator with a soft spot for the little guy. She called to make sure I understood that the boat harbor is a special place.

Lundby pointed out that while so many waterfronts in Iowa, such as West Lake Okoboji, are dominated by pricey homes and private resorts, Ellis Boat Harbor is a place where a working Joe or Jane could have a spot on the water. It’s also a unique community in this day and age, with workers and bosses, clock-punchers and big shots, all mixing together as they have for years.

She was right then, and the DNR is wrong now.

But there’s time for the department to work this out and change course.

There has to be a way for the boathouse community to coexist with some sort of expanded public access. Boathouse owners will have to accept changes. And regulators have to value people over process and history over bureaucracy.

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Rushing to the Microphones

You don’t need to be a high-paid flood consultant to understand the significance of Tuesday’s news that  a $516 million share of federal disaster recovery bucks Iowa finally broke loose from the D.C. glacier and is headed for Iowa.

With any luck, it means long-awaited home buyouts and a mountain of other pent-up needs can be addressed soon. We may actually see some real, tangible progress this summer. Sure, there are the nagging questions of what took you so long and exactly when do we get the next shipment, but we’ll leave those for now.

You also didn’t have to be a high-paid political consultant to understand the significance of the announcement in political terms.

All you had to do was watch the rush to the microphones. Once the news broke, Culver was blowing the trumpet on WMT radio and to The Gazette and to anyone who would listen. U.S. Rep. Dave Loebsack and U.S. Sen Tom Harkin joined the Big Lug in a flood of cheery press releases.

Somehow, the dynamic Dem trio didn’t mention Republican U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley. I’ll speak for him, in his native Twitter.  “Bout tme u get flod $ to Iowa lzy burocats.”

Speaking of bureaucrats, not one but two cabinet secretaries, U.S. Housing and Urban Development Sec. Shaun Donovan and U.S. Ag Sec. Tom Vilsack, will be in town today to trumpet the news and tour the flood zone (Memo to zone-skipper Janet Napolitano). Evidently the Obama administration thinks this is a significant moment as well in a politically significant state.

Probably the biggest winner is Loebsack, who really needed some good news to trumpet. The longer progress was stalled, the more vulnerable he has been to the accusation that we have a congressman who can’t make things happen. Now, at long last, things are happening.

It’s also good for Culver. While his potential Republican rivals explore and skirmish over he direction of their party, the Big Lug gets to drop into Eastern Iowa, likely in his bomber jacket, smile big, and deliver the goods. The power of incumbency, on display.

Close behind are potential CR mayoral candidates Brian Fagan and Monica Vernon, both members of the City Council. They’ve delayed jumping into the race, perhaps hoping that if money came and progress was made, they’d have something to show skeptical voters. This money may smooth their path.

But, in the end, it’s worth noting that Cedar Rapids will probably get $200 million or so from this pot of bucks to help recover from a $6 billion disaster. So let’s not get too giddy. This money isn’t going to solve our problems. It’s really just one step.

But after a year of waiting for some real recovery bucks, one step feels pretty good.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Coaxed by Oats

Quaker kit

A couple weeks ago I wrote about the curious Quaker Oats box media kits sent out to national news outlets with hopes of coaxing them to cover Cedar Rapids’ flood anniversary and ongoing recovery.

Cassie Willis, the city’s communications liaison, says, so far, four news organizations have responded.

National Public Radio is sending a reporter and the Associated Press will offer a story on its national wire. NBC news plans to air a piece next Friday and Fox News is sending a crew next week, Willis said.

Still no word from “Good Morning America,” despite numerous electronic overtures from locals on the show’s Web site.

Face it, folks, it’s tough to get attention with so many other important things happening. Hey, maybe we could organize a Jon and Kate-Octomom summit meeting here next week. Now that would get some coverage.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized